When tourism meets pastoralism: smallholder livelihood dilemmas and overgrazing in the fragile Tien-Shan montane grasslands

Representative landscape of the tourism-pastoralism compromise in the Nalati grassland (photocredit: Dandan Zhao)
Representative landscape of the tourism-pastoralism compromise in the Nalati grassland (Photocredit: Dandan Zhao)

Rapid shifts in land-use policies and environmental conditions have made overgrazing a significant challenge to the sustainability of China’s fragile drylands, particularly the Tien-Shan montane grasslands. However, our understanding of the extent to which rangeland degradation is linked to the livelihoods of individual pastoralists adapting to these changes remains limited, especially in the context of the increasing intersection between subsistence pastoralism and tourism development. To evaluate the proposition that “smaller pastures lead to better tourism and less overgrazing”, we conducted a survey of 30 pastoral households managing small (<33 ha), medium, and large (>53 ha) pastures across two villages in the western Tien-Shan mountains, where tourism is on the rise and grassland degradation is evident. Our findings indicate that over the past two decades, the grassland vegetation in the studied area has undergone homogenization, degradation, and fragmentation. Households with small pastures tended to maintain higher livestock densities to support tourism infrastructure, which in turn intensified overgrazing. In contrast, large-pasture households relied on traditional grazing regimes, which resulted in lower levels of overgrazing but generated less income from tourism. Medium-pasture households attempted to cultivate forage grasses to balance both livelihoods, albeit with limited success. Despite these differing strategies, all groups achieved comparable annual incomes. This creates a paradox where increased tourism revenue in small pastures correlates with intensified overgrazing. Our study is the first to highlight that the coexistence of tourism and pastoralism poses critical challenges for grassland sustainability, particularly when smallholders are compelled to fragment pastures for tourism purposes. We argue that achieving a balance between these livelihoods in fragile ecosystems necessitates collaborative management approaches that integrate traditional pastoral practices with equitable tourism planning.

Zhao, D., Bayaerta, Liu, Z. et al. When tourism meets pastoralism: smallholder livelihood dilemmas and overgrazing in the fragile Tien-Shan montane grasslands. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 45, 62 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-025-01064-9

Landscape perspectives for agroecological weed management. A review

The current research effort on agroecological weed management is largely rooted in agronomy and field-scale farming practices. This article reviews current knowledge of landscape effects on weed communities and seed predation. The ecological processes underlying landscape effects, their interaction with in-field approaches, and the implications of landscape-scale change for agroecological weed management are discussed.

Boinot, S., Alignier, A. & Storkey, J. Landscape perspectives for agroecological weed management. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 44, 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00941-5

Exploring which diversity designs sustainable agricultural territory

Picture copyright INRAE and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature

It is a challenge to understand how on-farm diversity can be mobilized to design sustainable agricultural systems. Scientists Lurette et al. used a model to represents the diversity in the organization of several farms composing a territory in the South of France. They showed how diversity impacted farm performances, and how external inputs or subsidies impacted their sustainability. Pairing territory composition diversity with on-farm diversity will help in designing sustainable agricultural systems.

The key role of ley pastures in tomorrow’s cropping systems

Picture copyright Martin et al.

Diversification of cropping systems is a major way towards sustainable agriculture. Scientists Martin et al. recently reviewed the impacts of integrating ley pastures in cropping systems. Such pastures provide farmers with a wide range of services, including soil conservation, nutrient provision and recycling, soil water retention, and biological control of pests and weeds. Lay pastures contribute also other services to the society, such as water purification, climate regulation, habitat provision for conserving associated biodiversity, and forage production.

Crop production on terrace walls to improve food security and livelihoods

Picture copyright Chapagain et al.

Millions of hillside farmers around the world cultivate crops on narrow terraces, whose walls are often underutilized. Scientists Chapagrain et al. recently showed that cultivation of wall-climbing crops (e.g. chayote squash, pumpkin, yam) and wall-descending crops (e.g. ricebean, cowpea, horsegram, blackgram) can enhance economic returns to farmers. The adoption of this promising practice can improve the ecosystems and the well-being of terrace farmers.

Apps to improve the sustainability of agricultural landscapes

Mobile apps are available for agriculture but very few are designed to help farmers connect to information on environmental, social, and economic sustainability concerns beyond the field or farm. Scientists Eichler et al. reviewed existing web-based and mobile apps for agriculture decision support. They highlight a need for apps that improve multi-directional knowledge sharing through sensor, satellite, and farmer networking.

No-till permanent meadow in the prospect of sustainable intensification

Picture copyright Enrico Ceotto

Maximizing crop production while improving soil carbon storage and nitrogen-use efficiency is a major challenge in the sustainable intensification of agro-ecosystems. Agronomists Castelli et. al. compared four arable systems and a no-till permanent meadow during a 30 year field experiment. All ecosystems caused clear trade-offs between services. Both the no-till permanent meadow and the most productive annual rotation lead to win-lose solutions. Farmers, however, may justify high fertilization practices if their management goal is to spare land for less intensive uses such as permanent meadow.

Deforestation creates soil carbon and nitrogen losses in Ethiopia

Picture copyright Berihu et al.

Ethiopia faces high risk of soil carbon depletion largely due to deforestation and continuous cultivation. Deforestation has resulted in losses of between 20 and 50 percent of the soil carbon stocks in the first meter of the soil depth. Scientists Berihu et al. studied the effect of land use-land cover changes on soil organic carbon and nitrogen. They found that the soil organic carbon sequestration and total nitrogen content for dense forest were significantly higher than that of grassland, open forest, and farm land. Conversion of forest to other land use may lead to massive losses in soil nutrients.

Live tree fences reduce the variability of soil CO2 emissions.

Picture copyright VILLANUEVA-LÓPEZ et al.

Tropical deforestation for grass plantations for livestock production is responsible for about 30% of CO2 emissions. Life fencing, which is the use of trees for fences, may help to decrease and balance CO2 emissions. Villanueva-López et al. studied the impact of live fences of Gliricidia Sepium trees in livestock systems on soil CO2 emissions. They found that CO2 emissions did not differ with or without tree fences, but they also evidenced that tree fences reduced the diurnal and seasonal variability of soil CO2 emissions.

Soil carbon to save drylands

Picture copyright PLAZA-BONILLA et al.
Picture copyright PLAZA-BONILLA et al.

Drylands turn rapidly into bare deserts if soil carbon is not correctly managed. Indeed soil carbon has many beneficial properties such as water holding, plant nutrient storage and glueing the minerals to prevent erosion. In addition storing more carbon in drylands would slow down global warming. Plaza-Bonilla et al. review the management of organic and inorganic carbon in drylands.