Effect of climate change adaptation options on maize yield across different agro-climatic zones in South Asia. A meta-analysis

figure 1
(A) Photograph of maize field (credit: N. Jain); (B) maize cobs (credit: CIMMYT-India).

Maize (Zea mays L.), despite being an important cereal crop, faces up to 30% yield loss due to climate-induced hazards such as heat and drought. Various adaptation options have been suggested to mitigate climate risks, however their effectiveness often varies across agroclimatic zones due to diverse climates and soils, a largely understudied aspect, making adoption decisions challenging. This is the first study to analyze the linkage between regional climatic hazards and potential adaptation strategies, evaluating their suitability across diverse agroecological zones, soils and seasons in South Asia. Additionally, we strengthen our work by using local literature from South Asia to introduce granularity and enhance the contextual relevance of our findings. A meta-analysis involving subgroup analysis and meta-regression was conducted to capture the influence of agroclimatic zones, soil textures, and seasonal weather on yield benefits. Among 1114 observations reviewed for meta-analysis, 62% reported a positive yield response. Among several options analyzed, in-situ moisture conservation, nutrient management and zero tillage showed mean yield benefits of 6.8%, 6.2% and 4.3%, respectively, over conventional practices across South Asia. Nutrient management and zero tillage resulted in yield benefits of 8.44% and 9.75% in the central-western zone, respectively and 7.73% yield benefit with nutrient management in the north-eastern plan zone. The seasonal analysis revealed a significant mean effect size of in-situ moisture conservation (45.6%) and nutrient management (10.92%) in the dry season. Fine-textured soils had a significant positive impact of adaptation options in both wet and dry seasons, while coarse-textured soils had a notable positive effect only in dry season. Performance of adaptation options was strongly influenced by rainfall and temperature, underscoring the need for region-specific technologies. Our findings improve the understanding of the suitability and effectiveness of adaptation options across different regions, thereby enabling policymakers and practitioners to select appropriate adaptation options for greater benefits.

Jain, N., Verma, H., Deo, A. et al. Effect of climate change adaptation options on maize yield across different agro-climatic zones in South Asia. A meta-analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 45, 78 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-025-01075-6

Optimizing sustainability in rice-based cropping systems: a holistic approach for integrating soil carbon farming, energy efficiency, and greenhouse gas reduction strategies via resource conservation practices

Standing crops of the experimental plots
Standing crops of the experimental plots (photo credit: Pradeep Kumar Dash).

The study underscores the potential of rice-green gram systems under resource conservation technologies in enhancing sustainability and resilience in lowland rice agroecosystems, particularly in Eastern India. Conducted over multiple cropping seasons as part of a long-term experiment, the research evaluated six conservation practices, including zero tillage, green manure, and biochar, in comparison to conventional methods. Among these, zero tillage emerged as the most effective climate-smart practice, achieving the highest carbon sequestration rate (0.97 Mg ha-1 yr-1), substantial energy savings (52.0%–67.8%), and the lowest global warming potential. These findings demonstrate the capacity of resource conservation technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enhance soil organic carbon stocks, and improve productivity, thereby offering a sustainable pathway to mitigate methane emissions and balance agricultural productivity with environmental stewardship. This research highlights the vital role of innovative practices like zero tillage with residue management treatments in advancing climate-smart agriculture and achieving long-term ecological and agricultural resilience.

Dash, P.K., Bhattacharyya, P., Padhy, S.R. et al. Optimizing sustainability in rice-based cropping systems: a holistic approach for integrating soil carbon farming, energy efficiency, and greenhouse gas reduction strategies via resource conservation practices. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 45, 11 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-025-01005-6

Straw mulch and nitrogen fertilizer: A viable green solution for enhanced maize benefits and reduced emissions in China

Fig. 1Using the calibrated DeNitrification-DeComposition (DNDC) model, we conducted a long-term simulation (1980−2019) incorporating various scenarios of nitrogen fertilizer and mulch, resulting in a baseline scenario and five mitigation scenarios. We revealed an average net global warming potential during the maize growing season of 5293 kg CO2 eq ha−1, with the most GHG derived from N2O (53%). Considering GHG costs, the net environmental and economic benefits in maize amounted to 5089 CNY ha−1. Our results, which provide the first calculation of the combined benefits of mulch and nitrogen fertilizer including GHG costs, not only underscore the immense potential of mulch for enabling carbon neutrality, but also offer valuable insights for policymakers and industry in selecting suitable mulch techniques for agricultural production.

Wei, H., Zhang, L., Qin, R. et al. Straw mulch and nitrogen fertilizer: A viable green solution for enhanced maize benefits and reduced emissions in China. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 44, 52 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00988-y

Combining climate information and geographic risk spreading strategies increases grazing profitability

Picture copyright David Cobon

Climate variability strongly influences the profitability of grazing. Scientists Nguyen-Huy et al. demonstrate that graziers can strategically move their production to other areas based on changing seasonal climate conditions. They also show that using climate information and geographic risk spreading strategies together can help graziers minimize climate risk, while not sacrificing profitability. The approach is applicable to other parts of the world and could be used to optimize risk and profitability for other agricultural sectors exposed to variable climatic conditions.

Climate change and cacao

Picture copyright Lahive et al.

The future of chocolate production is dependent on how the cacao tree will respond to climate change. Scientists Lahive et al. review current research on the physiological responses of cacao trees to the environment and advocate for greater consideration of tree physiology when discussing the future of cacao production. They also highlight key areas of research that need to be addressed to aid in the development of more climate resilient cacao for the future.

‘Gobi agriculture’ – producing fruit and vegetable on desert-like land

Picture copyright Xie et al.

Shortage of arable land creates unprecedented challenges to produce enough food to satisfy the increased food demands. Scientists Xie et al. show that the desert-like, non-arable land can be developed by building ‘clusters’ of solar-energy greenhouses in which land productivity is higher and crop water use efficiency greater than in traditional open-field, irrigated cultivation systems. Although many challenges remain to be addressed, this innovative system has potential for areas with available barren land.

Climate-smart agriculture requires efforts at both the supply- and demand-side

Picture copyright Scherer and Verburg

The twin challenges of climate change and food security call for climate-smart agriculture, that is to say agriculture that helps to mitigate and adapt to climate change. Scientists Scherer and Verburg review the potentials and trade-offs of climate-smart agricultural measures taken by producers and consumers, and identify their linkages. They advocate not solely focusing research and implementation on one-sided measures but designing good, site-specific combinations of both demand- and supply-side measures to use the potential of climate-smart agriculture more effectively.

The tricky management of heat stress in wheat

Picture copyright Maitre, INRA

Heat stress lowers wheat growth and productivity. Agronomists Akter and Islam review some appropriate strategies able to improve wheat yield under extreme heat stress. These include the choice of cultivars, the management of soil moisture and nutrients, the adjustment of planting time and the use of exogenous protectants. It remains, however, that the overall success of the complex wheat heat stress management will depend on the prospective collaboration of crop modelers, molecular biologists, and plant physiologists.

Planting Azolla to reduce methane emission from rice

Picture copyright Xu et al.

Reducing methane emission and maintaining rice sustainable production are two major challenges in rice production. Scientists Xu et al. showed that planting the free-floating water fern Azolla along with double rice reduced methane emission in rice paddies due to significant effect on dissolved oxygen and soil redox potential, which are key factors for methane emission.

Greenhouse gas abatement costs in Australian agriculture

Picture copyright Elizabeth Meier

Agriculture contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and there is a need for identifying viable long term reduction steps that farmers can adopt. Scientists Dumbrell et al. identified the greenhouse gas mitigation potential and the costs of abatement at three Australian grain farms located in the main grain growing regions of Australia. They found marked difference in abatement potential and impact on operating profits across case study farms and management practices. Reaching significant climate change abatement will come at a cost to farmers.