Adapting the Indigenous Three Sisters system to modern row cropping practices

Illustration of the traditional ways of planting Three Sisters crops together in a small area. Photocredit: Ying Chen.

The Indigenous companion planting technique known as the Three Sisters system improves soil health, weed control, and crop yields by combining mutually beneficial crops. However, existing research focuses on small-scale gardening, while modern agriculture’s reliance on large land and machinery makes the traditional garden-based approach impractical. This study is the first to explore the adaptation of the Three Sisters system to modern row-cropping practices. Two-year field experiments were conducted in Manitoba, Canada. The Three Sisters crops, sweet corn (Zea mays L.), pole bean, and summer squash, were grown under four planting modes: corn monoculture, corn with bean companion, corn with bean and squash companion, and squash monoculture. Key measurements included soil moisture content, leaf area index, crop yield components, and soil nitrogen levels. Results showed that companion plots with two or three crops generally had lower soil moisture compared to monocultures, with squash monoculture plots retaining the most soil moisture. Among the companion plots, similar soil moisture levels indicated corn as the dominant water consumer. The leaf area index of squash monoculture plots increased rapidly in mid-season, with plots containing squash achieving the highest indices later in the season. Bean contributions to leaf area index were minimal due to corn canopy dominance during early growth stages and squash canopy dominance later. Monoculture plots produced higher individual crop yields, whereas companion planting offered greater produce diversity and a higher total yield of combined crops. The timing of bean planting had inconclusive effects on corn yields but consistently improved bean yields when delayed. Companion plots with three crops exhibited lower residual soil nitrogen, suggesting potential water quality benefits. This study offers guidance on adapting the traditional Three Sisters system to modern row-cropping practices, presenting a sustainable approach that balances agricultural productivity with ecological and human health benefits.

Guo, J., Mooney, H., Wu, P. et al. Adapting the Indigenous Three Sisters system to modern row cropping practices. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 45, 47 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-025-01041-2

Applying green manure and zeolite and reducing N fertilization in maize mitigates N2O emission while maintaining yield

Planting pattern of the spatial arrangement of monoculture maize (a) and maize intercropped with green manure (b) systems. Maize monoculture system at the jointing (V9) stage (c). Maize intercropped with common vetch at the seedling stage (d). Chamber setup in maize and inter-row space/common vetch row, respectively (c and d). All photographs by the authors.

Green manure is widely employed to substitute chemical N fertilizer. However, the potential of further alleviating N2O emission when combined with efficient management technologies has not been fully explored. To reduce this research gap, a 2-year field experiment was conducted in northwestern China. The aim was to investigate the impact of zeolite application on N2O emission in the maize-common vetch intercropping system under 30% N reduction, as well as the possible mechanisms. The experiment included two cropping systems, namely monoculture maize and maize-common vetch intercropping, along with three amendment practices, namely conventional N, 70% conventional N, and zeolite application under 70% conventional N. Compared with monoculture maize under conventional N, maize-green manure intercropping combined with zeolite application under 70% chemical N achieved comparable yields. Simultaneously, this practice reduced cumulative N2O and yield-scaled N2O emissions by 36.9% and 39.2%, respectively. This reduction can be attributed to a decrease in soil ammonium-N by 20.9%–57.7%, nitrate-N by 47.7%–51.3%, nitrate reductase activities by 25.3%–34.4% and N2O-producer (i.e., nirS and nirK) abundance by 17.3%–79.4% in denitrification, and an increase in the N2O-reducer (i.e., nosZ) abundance by 40.0%–103.4%. Compared with 100% N input, 70% chemical N treatment reduced ammonium-N by 22.3%–41.0%, nitrate-N by 25.4%–41.0%, and N2O-producer abundance by 17.1%–35.0% in denitrification. Zeolite application reduced denitrifying enzyme activities by 8.2%–12.9%, N2O-producer abundance by 42.5%–56.4%, but increased N2O-reducer abundance by 13.3%–23.3% in denitrification. PLS-PM analysis showed that N2O emission mitigation was mainly related to reduced soil ammonium-N and nitrate-N, decreased N2O-producer abundance, and increased N2O-reducer abundance in denitrification. These findings provide new insights into the fact that intercropping green manure combined with zeolite application effectively mitigates N2O emission by regulating mineral N, N-cycling enzymes, and denitrifier abundances while maintaining maize yield after cutting 30% N input.

Liu, R., Chang, D., Liang, H. et al. Applying green manure and zeolite and reducing N fertilization in maize mitigates N2O emission while maintaining yield. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 45, 43 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-025-01033-2

Cultivar mixtures increase stability and productivity over time through asynchrony and complementarity

Field experiment conducted in the southern suburbs, Zhangye City, Gansu Province, Northwest China. Photocredit: Long Li.

In a seven-year field experiment, we found that maize cultivar mixtures increased grain yields and stabilized year-to-year yields over time, which was attributed to increased asynchrony and complementarity among cultivars, differences in functional traits, and plasticity in response to neighbors. These mechanisms provide new insight into how intraspecific diversity increases both natural and agricultural ecosystem functioning.

 

 

Su, Y., Zhang, WP., Zhao, JH. et al. Cultivar mixtures increase stability and productivity over time through asynchrony and complementarity. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 45, 20 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-025-01014-5

Diversity, adoption and performances of inter-row management practices in immature rubber plantations. A review

The immature period of rubber plantations is rarely characterized and assessed, despite its significant economic and environmental impacts. Our literature review on inter-row management highlights a diversity of practices, with the drivers of adoption and the effects on the plots’ performances. Our findings reveal gaps in existing knowledge essential for a comprehensive understanding of current management in immature rubber plantations.

Simon, C., Thoumazeau, A., Chambon, B. et al. Diversity, adoption and performances of inter-row management practices in immature rubber plantations. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 44, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00944-w

Intercropping indices evaluation on grain legume-small grain cereals mixture

Intercropping is a farming practice where multiple crops are grown together in the same field. It has been extensively studied in recent years. Researchers have developed over 20 unique indices to compare intercropping with traditional farming practices. Our study collected data from previous intercropping experiments and evaluated those data on the existing indices. We found that the success of intercropping depends on factors such as crop density and ratio, and indices differ in the way that these factors are accounted for. To improve research in this area, it is important to establish a standard protocol for conducting and evaluating intercropping trials. This will ensure that future research is effective and can provide accurate comparisons to traditional farming practices.

  • Zustovi, R., Landschoot, S., Dewitte, K. et al. Intercropping indices evaluation on grain legume-small grain cereals mixture: a critical meta-analysis review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 44, 5 (2024).
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00934-4

Cereal-cowpea intercropping for sustainable intensification in sub-Saharan Africa

Picture copyright CIMMYT

Intercropping is a common sustainable practice that improves land productivity in smallholder farms in sub-Saharan Africa. Namatsheve et al. reviewed the main cereal-cowpea intercropping systems, comprising maize, sorghum, and pearl millet. Intercropping increased land productivity by 25-40% compared to monocropping systems, with cowpea intercropped being able to contribute significant amounts of nitrogen to the system. The authors suggest several ways to improve these systems.