{"id":6627,"date":"2025-12-05T12:09:35","date_gmt":"2025-12-05T11:09:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=6627"},"modified":"2025-12-05T12:09:35","modified_gmt":"2025-12-05T11:09:35","slug":"how-to-define-and-quantify-substitution-effects-in-the-bioeconomy-a-scoping-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2025\/12\/05\/how-to-define-and-quantify-substitution-effects-in-the-bioeconomy-a-scoping-review\/","title":{"rendered":"How to define and quantify substitution effects in the bioeconomy: a scoping review"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/12\/25-12-05_Gordillo-F.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-6628 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/12\/25-12-05_Gordillo-F-300x207.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"285\" height=\"196\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/12\/25-12-05_Gordillo-F-300x207.png 300w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/12\/25-12-05_Gordillo-F-640x441.png 640w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/12\/25-12-05_Gordillo-F.png 685w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 285px) 100vw, 285px\" \/><\/a>Key message<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Research on substitution effects in the bioeconomy remains conceptually fragmented and methodologically narrow\u2014focused predominantly on fossil-to-biomass material and energetic substitution, forest-derived biomass, carbon-related metrics, and single-method assessments. This limits its policy relevance. Comprehensive monitoring frameworks for sustainable biomass use must integrate environmental, behavioral, and systemic perspectives. Moving beyond a wood-based focus is essential to address socio-economic trade-offs and cross-border effects, thereby guiding robust, evidence-based policies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\nBioeconomy; Biomass utilization; Climate change Mitigation; Displacement Factor (DF); Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Monitoring<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1186\/s13595-025-01299-2'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><br \/>\nGordillo, F., Weimar, H. How to define and quantify substitution effects in the bioeconomy: a scoping review.\u00a0<i>Annals of Forest Science<\/i>\u00a082, 26 (2025). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-025-01299-2\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-025-01299-2<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data availability<\/strong><br \/>\nThe data set supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the Open Agrar repository. It can be found online at\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3220\/253-2025-2\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3220\/253-2025-2<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Handling editor<\/strong><br \/>\nFr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Bonin<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message Research on substitution effects in the bioeconomy remains conceptually fragmented and methodologically narrow\u2014focused predominantly on fossil-to-biomass material and energetic substitution, forest-derived biomass, carbon-related metrics, and single-method assessments. This limits its policy relevance. Comprehensive monitoring frameworks for sustainable biomass use must integrate environmental, behavioral, and systemic perspectives. Moving beyond a wood-based focus is essential [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":240,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,1,109,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-non-classe","category-open-access","category-review-paper","cat-14-id","cat-1-id","cat-109-id","cat-16-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/240"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6627"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6627\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6633,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6627\/revisions\/6633"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}