{"id":6335,"date":"2025-03-18T10:34:00","date_gmt":"2025-03-18T09:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=6335"},"modified":"2025-03-18T10:34:00","modified_gmt":"2025-03-18T09:34:00","slug":"influence-of-mechanical-stress-on-biomass-allocation-in-three-species-pachira-aquatica-aubl-sextonia-rubra-mez-van-der-werff-and-simarouba-amara-aubl-with-contrasting-posture-control-mechanisms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2025\/03\/18\/influence-of-mechanical-stress-on-biomass-allocation-in-three-species-pachira-aquatica-aubl-sextonia-rubra-mez-van-der-werff-and-simarouba-amara-aubl-with-contrasting-posture-control-mechanisms\/","title":{"rendered":"Influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanisms"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong>Key message<a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/03\/2025_Vol82n2_Ghislain.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-6338 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/03\/2025_Vol82n2_Ghislain-300x236.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"236\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/03\/2025_Vol82n2_Ghislain-300x236.png 300w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/03\/2025_Vol82n2_Ghislain-1024x805.png 1024w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/03\/2025_Vol82n2_Ghislain-768x603.png 768w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/03\/2025_Vol82n2_Ghislain-1536x1207.png 1536w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/03\/2025_Vol82n2_Ghislain-2048x1609.png 2048w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/03\/2025_Vol82n2_Ghislain-640x503.png 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The posture control in Pachira aquatica, Sextonia rubra and Simarouba amara is achieved through contrasted mechanisms involving tensile stress in wood only, bark only or both. This study evidenced that the restoration of verticality does not imply an overall cost for trees but modifies growth kinetics and biomass allocation to organs and tissues, improving the posture control of the trees in the three species.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Tree ; Biomass allocation ; Partitioning ; Tension wood ; Bark ; Growth kinetics ; Gravitropic stimulus<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1186\/s13595-025-01273-y'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ghislain, B., Coste, S., Faure, G. et al. Influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanisms. Annals of Forest Science 82, 2 (2025). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-025-01273-y\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-025-01273-y<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data and\/or code availability<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The data that support the findings of this study are deposited in CNRS Research Data and accessible at <a href=\"https:\/\/entrepot.recherche.data.gouv.fr\/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.57745\/6RIG38\">https:\/\/entrepot.recherche.data.gouv.fr\/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.57745\/6RIG38<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Handling Editor<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Alexia Stokes<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message The posture control in Pachira aquatica, Sextonia rubra and Simarouba amara is achieved through contrasted mechanisms involving tensile stress in wood only, bark only or both. This study evidenced that the restoration of verticality does not imply an overall cost for trees but modifies growth kinetics and biomass allocation to organs and tissues, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":185,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,109,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-open-access","category-research-paper","cat-14-id","cat-109-id","cat-15-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/185"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6335"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6335\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6341,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6335\/revisions\/6341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}