{"id":5917,"date":"2024-01-18T11:10:09","date_gmt":"2024-01-18T10:10:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=5917"},"modified":"2024-01-18T11:10:09","modified_gmt":"2024-01-18T10:10:09","slug":"factors-determining-fine-scale-spatial-genetic-structure-within-coexisting-populations-of-common-beech-fagus-sylvatica-l-pedunculate-oak-quercus-robur-l-and-sessile-oak-q-petraea-matt-lie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2024\/01\/18\/factors-determining-fine-scale-spatial-genetic-structure-within-coexisting-populations-of-common-beech-fagus-sylvatica-l-pedunculate-oak-quercus-robur-l-and-sessile-oak-q-petraea-matt-lie\/","title":{"rendered":"Factors determining fine-scale spatial genetic structure within coexisting populations of common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.), and sessile oak (Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2024\/01\/Sandurska-2024.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-5920 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2024\/01\/Sandurska-2024-300x179.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"347\" height=\"207\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2024\/01\/Sandurska-2024-300x179.png 300w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2024\/01\/Sandurska-2024-768x457.png 768w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2024\/01\/Sandurska-2024-640x381.png 640w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2024\/01\/Sandurska-2024.png 801w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 347px) 100vw, 347px\" \/><\/a>Key message<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Naturally regenerating populations of common beech, pedunculate and sessile oaks develop strong spatial genetic structures at adult and seedling stages. Significant genetic relationship occurs between individuals growing up to 60 m apart. This indicates the minimum distance separating trees from which seeds used for reforestation should be harvested to avoid the adverse effects of excessive relatedness among offspring.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Fagus sylvatica<\/em>; Microsatellites; Nature reserve; Offspring and adult cohorts; <em>Quercus petraea<\/em>; <em>Quercus robur<\/em>; Seed and pollen dispersal; Spatial genetic structure<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1186\/s13595-023-01217-4'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><br \/>\nSandurska, E., Ulaszewski, B., Meyza, K. et al. Factors determining fine-scale spatial genetic structure within coexisting populations of common beech (<em>Fagus sylvatica<\/em> L.), pedunculate oak (<em>Quercus robur<\/em> L.), and sessile oak (<em>Q. petraea<\/em> (Matt.) Liebl.). Annals of Forest Science 81, 3 (2024). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-023-01217-4\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-023-01217-4<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Share this article<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/rdcu.be\/dwjD6\">https:\/\/rdcu.be\/dwjD6<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data and\/or Code availability<\/strong><br \/>\nThe datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the RepOD repository, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18150\/0CNXA1\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18150\/0CNXA1<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Handling Editor<\/strong><br \/>\nV\u00e9ronique Jorge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message Naturally regenerating populations of common beech, pedunculate and sessile oaks develop strong spatial genetic structures at adult and seedling stages. Significant genetic relationship occurs between individuals growing up to 60 m apart. This indicates the minimum distance separating trees from which seeds used for reforestation should be harvested to avoid the adverse effects [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,110,109,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-data-in-repository","category-open-access","category-research-paper","cat-14-id","cat-110-id","cat-109-id","cat-15-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5917","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5917"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5917\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5922,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5917\/revisions\/5922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}