{"id":5846,"date":"2023-10-26T16:12:18","date_gmt":"2023-10-26T14:12:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=5846"},"modified":"2023-10-26T16:12:18","modified_gmt":"2023-10-26T14:12:18","slug":"potential-alternatives-for-norway-spruce-wood-a-selection-based-on-defect-free-wood-properties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2023\/10\/26\/potential-alternatives-for-norway-spruce-wood-a-selection-based-on-defect-free-wood-properties\/","title":{"rendered":"Potential alternatives for Norway spruce wood: a selection based on defect-free wood properties"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/10\/Huber-et-al-2023.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-5849 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/10\/Huber-et-al-2023-300x175.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"357\" height=\"208\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/10\/Huber-et-al-2023-300x175.png 300w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/10\/Huber-et-al-2023-768x447.png 768w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/10\/Huber-et-al-2023-640x372.png 640w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/10\/Huber-et-al-2023.png 940w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 357px) 100vw, 357px\" \/><\/a>Key message<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The application of material selection principles uncovered eight possible alternative tree species (two deciduous and six coniferous species) to substitute Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies<\/em> (L.) H. Karst.) and potentially prevent economic loss in European forest.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\nAlternative wood species; Bending strength; Bending stiffness; Wood material properties; Material selection<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1186\/s13595-023-01206-7'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><br \/>\nHuber, C., Langmaier, M., Stadlmann, A. et al. Potential alternatives for Norway spruce wood: a selection based on defect-free wood properties. Annals of Forest Science 80, 41 (2023).<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-023-01206-7\"> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-023-01206-7<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Share this article<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/rdcu.be\/dpxMB\">https:\/\/rdcu.be\/dpxMB<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data and\/or Code availability<\/strong><br \/>\nData will be made available on request.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Handling Editor<\/strong><br \/>\nJean-Michel Leban<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message The application of material selection principles uncovered eight possible alternative tree species (two deciduous and six coniferous species) to substitute Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) and potentially prevent economic loss in European forest. Keywords Alternative wood species; Bending strength; Bending stiffness; Wood material properties; Material selection Publication Huber, C., Langmaier, M., [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,109,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-open-access","category-review-paper","cat-14-id","cat-109-id","cat-16-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5846"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5846\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5851,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5846\/revisions\/5851"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}