{"id":5575,"date":"2023-01-10T16:12:43","date_gmt":"2023-01-10T15:12:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=5575"},"modified":"2023-01-10T16:12:43","modified_gmt":"2023-01-10T15:12:43","slug":"an-analysis-of-stand-level-size-distributions-of-decay-affected-norway-spruce-trees-based-on-harvester-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2023\/01\/10\/an-analysis-of-stand-level-size-distributions-of-decay-affected-norway-spruce-trees-based-on-harvester-data\/","title":{"rendered":"An analysis of stand-level size distributions of decay-affected Norway spruce trees based on harvester data"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/01\/Raty-2023.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-5578 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/01\/Raty-2023-278x300.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"278\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/01\/Raty-2023-278x300.png 278w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/01\/Raty-2023-768x829.png 768w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/01\/Raty-2023-640x691.png 640w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2023\/01\/Raty-2023.png 812w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 278px) 100vw, 278px\" \/><\/a>Key message<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">We studied size distributions of decay-affected Norway spruce trees using cut-to-length harvester data. The harvester data comprised tree-level decay and decay severity recordings from 101 final felling stands, which enabled to analyze relationships between size distributions of all and decay-affected trees. Distribution matching technique was used to transfer the size distribution of all trees into the diameter at breast height (DBH) distribution of decay-affected trees.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\nRoot and butt rot; <em>Heterobasidion<\/em> spp.; <em>Armillaria<\/em> spp.; Cut-to-length harvester; Forest management and planning<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1186\/s13595-022-01170-8'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><br \/>\nR\u00e4ty, J., Hietala, A.M., Breidenbach, J. et al. An analysis of stand-level size distributions of decay-affected Norway spruce trees based on harvester data. Annals of Forest Science 80, 2 (2023). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-022-01170-8\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13595-022-01170-8<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data and\/or Code availability<\/strong><br \/>\nThe dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is not publicly available due the private ownership of the harvester datasets.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Handling Editor<\/strong><br \/>\nJohn Lhotka<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message We studied size distributions of decay-affected Norway spruce trees using cut-to-length harvester data. The harvester data comprised tree-level decay and decay severity recordings from 101 final felling stands, which enabled to analyze relationships between size distributions of all and decay-affected trees. Distribution matching technique was used to transfer the size distribution of all [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,109,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-open-access","category-research-paper","cat-14-id","cat-109-id","cat-15-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5575"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5575\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5579,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5575\/revisions\/5579"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}