{"id":5236,"date":"2022-01-06T11:44:31","date_gmt":"2022-01-06T10:44:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=5236"},"modified":"2022-01-06T11:44:31","modified_gmt":"2022-01-06T10:44:31","slug":"localized-neighborhood-species-mingling-is-correlated-with-individual-tree-size-inequality-in-natural-forests-in-south-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2022\/01\/06\/localized-neighborhood-species-mingling-is-correlated-with-individual-tree-size-inequality-in-natural-forests-in-south-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Localized neighborhood species mingling is correlated with individual tree size inequality in natural forests in South China"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/01\/Wang-HX-2021.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-5239 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/01\/Wang-HX-2021-300x295.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"295\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/01\/Wang-HX-2021-300x295.png 300w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/01\/Wang-HX-2021-50x50.png 50w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/01\/Wang-HX-2021-640x630.png 640w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2022\/01\/Wang-HX-2021.png 754w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>Key message<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">We identified the significant spatial relationships between tree species mingling and size inequality in various species-rich natural forests in South China. Forest communities with low species mingling, or segregation of heterospecific trees, exhibited increased segregation of trees with dissimilar sizes. Large trees were more likely to be associated with high species mingling, and variation in neighboring tree sizes would also increase neighborhood species diversity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Context<\/strong> Numerous hypotheses such as Janzen\u2013Connell and herd immunity effects have been proposed to explain the coexistence of diverse species in plant communities. However, these mechanisms for maintaining diversity have been studied primarily through the lens of species diversity, whereas tree size diversity or relationships between size and species diversity resulting from local interactions have rarely been investigated.<br \/>\n<strong>Aims<\/strong> We aimed to identify relationships between spatial species mingling and tree size inequality using extensive plot data from species-rich forest ecosystems.<br \/>\n<strong>Methods<\/strong> We applied neighborhood-based methods and explored relationships between spatial species mingling and size inequality indices in 22 large forest plots (30 ha in total) in subtropical and tropical China.<br \/>\n<strong>Results<\/strong> Forest communities with low species mingling, or segregation of heterospecific trees, exhibited increased segregation of trees with dissimilar sizes. In most plots, large trees (e.g., dbh\u2009&gt;\u200930 cm) were extensively associated with high species mingling, and individual-tree neighborhood species and size diversity were closely correlated.<br \/>\n<strong>Conclusion<\/strong> Our findings suggest that both the spatial patterns of conspecific dispersal and neighborhood interactions play an important role in determining the spatial patterns of tree size and species diversity and eventually in shaping the structure of forest communities.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\nForest structure diversity; Intraspecific clustering; Janzen\u2013Connell; Large trees; Size inequality; Species mingling<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1007\/s13595-021-01111-x'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><br \/>\nWang, HX., Huang, SX., Zhang, SS. et al. Localized neighborhood species mingling is correlated with individual tree size inequality in natural forests in South China. Annals of Forest Science 78, 102 (2021). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-021-01111-x\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-021-01111-x<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>For the read-only version of the full text:<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/rdcu.be\/cEsGN\">https:\/\/rdcu.be\/cEsGN<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data and\/or Code availability<\/strong><br \/>\nThe datasets generated and\/or analyzed during the current study are deposited at Dryad, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5061\/dryad.8cz8w9gr3\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5061\/dryad.8cz8w9gr3<\/a><br \/>\nThe programming code used for the current study is available from the authors on request.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Handling Editor<\/strong><br \/>\nAndreas Bolte<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message We identified the significant spatial relationships between tree species mingling and size inequality in various species-rich natural forests in South China. Forest communities with low species mingling, or segregation of heterospecific trees, exhibited increased segregation of trees with dissimilar sizes. Large trees were more likely to be associated with high species mingling, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,110,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-data-in-repository","category-research-paper","cat-14-id","cat-110-id","cat-15-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5236"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5236\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5240,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5236\/revisions\/5240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}