{"id":4578,"date":"2021-01-11T11:28:14","date_gmt":"2021-01-11T10:28:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=4578"},"modified":"2021-01-11T11:28:14","modified_gmt":"2021-01-11T10:28:14","slug":"accounting-for-competition-in-multi-environment-tree-genetic-evaluations-a-case-study-with-hybrid-pines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2021\/01\/11\/accounting-for-competition-in-multi-environment-tree-genetic-evaluations-a-case-study-with-hybrid-pines\/","title":{"rendered":"Accounting for competition in multi-environment tree genetic evaluations: a case study with hybrid pines"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/01\/Belaber2021.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-4582 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/01\/Belaber2021-287x300.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"287\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/01\/Belaber2021-287x300.png 287w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/01\/Belaber2021-768x803.png 768w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/01\/Belaber2021-640x669.png 640w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2021\/01\/Belaber2021.png 818w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 287px) 100vw, 287px\" \/><\/a>Key message<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">A novel multi-environment competition individual-tree mixed model resulted in better fit, and greater individual narrow- and broad-sense heritabilities than the model without competition, notably for traits showing competition. In multi-environment tests, the proposed model would allow tree breeders to select genotypes with the best performance in both additive direct and competition breeding values, increasing forest productivity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Context<\/strong> Genetic merit of trees is known to be affected and interact with local competition effects as well as changes across environmental conditions. Recent studies showed that competition genetic effects can affect the genetic variance and bias the tree breeding values, and its covariance with direct breeding values has been variable across traits.<br \/>\n<strong>Aims<\/strong> The present paper extends a mixed-model methodology to the problem of accounting for competition in a multi-environment set of forest genetic trials and exploring its impact on genetic variances as well as the multi-environment genetic correlation.<br \/>\n<strong>Methods<\/strong> The proposed model is illustrated using data from two full-sib trials of <em>Pinus elliottii<\/em> var. <em>elliottii<\/em> \u00d7 <em>Pinus caribaea<\/em> var. <em>hondurensis<\/em> F1. Dispersion parameters and (co)variance of total breeding values were estimated for diameter at breast height, total tree height, and stem straightness at age 10.<br \/>\n<strong>Results<\/strong> For traits showing competition effects (diameter at breast height and total tree height), the proposed multi-environment competition model gave better fit than the simpler model. Accounting for competition increased the direct additive variance, reduced the residual variances, and did not change significantly the across-site additive genetic correlation. However, for diameter at breast height, top 5% best genetic rankings showed differences.<br \/>\n<strong>Conclusion<\/strong> When traits are strongly affected by inter-tree competition, the use of the proposed model in multi-environment analyses can efficiently identify the phenomenon with general benefits in the fitting of genetic components and open the door to select on the basis of competitiveness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\nAdditive and competition genotype\u2013environment interaction; Total heritable variance; Tree breeding<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1007\/s13595-020-01015-2'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><br \/>\nBelaber, E.C., Gauchat, M.E., Schoffen, C.D. et al. Accounting for competition in multi-environment tree genetic evaluations: a case study with hybrid pines. Annals of Forest Science 78, 2 (2021). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-020-01015-2\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-020-01015-2<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>For the read-only version of the full text:<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/rdcu.be\/cdngq\">https:\/\/rdcu.be\/cdngq<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data availability<\/strong><br \/>\nData sets (INTA 2020) used during the current study are available in the CIRAD repository: <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18167\/DVN1\/FFGMFE\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18167\/DVN1\/FFGMFE<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Handling Editor<\/strong><br \/>\nRicardo Alia<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message A novel multi-environment competition individual-tree mixed model resulted in better fit, and greater individual narrow- and broad-sense heritabilities than the model without competition, notably for traits showing competition. In multi-environment tests, the proposed model would allow tree breeders to select genotypes with the best performance in both additive direct and competition breeding values, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,110,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-data-in-repository","category-research-paper","cat-14-id","cat-110-id","cat-15-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4578"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4578\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}