{"id":4470,"date":"2020-09-29T14:19:18","date_gmt":"2020-09-29T12:19:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=4470"},"modified":"2020-09-29T14:19:18","modified_gmt":"2020-09-29T12:19:18","slug":"a-meta-analysis-of-changes-in-soil-organic-carbon-stocks-after-afforestation-with-deciduous-broadleaved-sempervirent-broadleaved-and-conifer-tree-species","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2020\/09\/29\/a-meta-analysis-of-changes-in-soil-organic-carbon-stocks-after-afforestation-with-deciduous-broadleaved-sempervirent-broadleaved-and-conifer-tree-species\/","title":{"rendered":"A meta-analysis of changes in soil organic carbon stocks after afforestation with deciduous broadleaved, sempervirent broadleaved, and conifer tree species"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/09\/Hou2020.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-4473 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/09\/Hou2020-300x193.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"264\" height=\"170\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/09\/Hou2020-300x193.png 300w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/09\/Hou2020-768x493.png 768w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/09\/Hou2020-640x411.png 640w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/09\/Hou2020.png 864w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 264px) 100vw, 264px\" \/><\/a>Key message<\/strong><br \/>\nDifferent tree species have dissimilar capacities to sequester soil organic carbon (SOC). Deciduous broadleaved trees show the most stable increase in SOC stock after afforestation than other tree species, while sempervirent conifer trees show the lowest rate of SOC stock change. Sempervirent broadleaved trees show the greatest increase in SOC stock 20 years after afforestation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Context<\/strong> The rate at which soil organic carbon (SOC) stock changes after afforestation varies considerably with the tree species. A better understanding of the role of tree species in SOC change dynamic is needed to evaluate the SOC sequestration potential of afforestation programs.<br \/>\n<strong>Aims<\/strong> The aim of this paper is to identify the dissimilar rates at which different tree species sequester SOC, following afforestation.<br \/>\n<strong>Methods<\/strong> We complete a meta-analysis with 544 data points from 261 sites in 90 papers. We group tree species into decidious broadleved, sempervirent broadleaved and sempervirent conifer. We use standardization and\/or extrapolation methods to standardize soil depths. Statistical analysis test the main effects of tree species and their interactions with previous land use and plantation age on SOC stock change after afforestation.<br \/>\n<strong>Results<\/strong> Deciduous broadleaved trees show a stable increase in SOC stock, and are especially suited for afforestation of grassland or soils with high initial SOC. Sempervirent broadleaved afforestation results in loss of SOC stock in young stands, but greater SOC stock in mature stands. Sempervirent conifer trees show the lowest rate of SOC stock change, but are suitable for nutrient-poor soil.<br \/>\n<strong>Conclusion<\/strong> The results emphasize the importance of considering tree species when estimating SOC stock change, in particular when carbon sequestration is an objective of afforestation programs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\nSoil organic carbon stock change; Afforestation; Deciduous broadleaved; Sempervirent broadleaved; Sempervirent conifer<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1007\/s13595-020-00997-3'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><br \/>\nHou, G., Delang, C.O., Lu, X. et al. A meta-analysis of changes in soil organic carbon stocks after afforestation with deciduous broadleaved, sempervirent broadleaved, and conifer tree species. Annals of Forest Science 77, 92 (2020). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-020-00997-3\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-020-00997-3<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>For the read-only version of the full text:<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/rdcu.be\/b7QLJ\">https:\/\/rdcu.be\/b7QLJ<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data availability<\/strong><br \/>\nAll data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Handling Editor<\/strong><br \/>\nAna Rinc\u00f3n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message Different tree species have dissimilar capacities to sequester soil organic carbon (SOC). Deciduous broadleaved trees show the most stable increase in SOC stock after afforestation than other tree species, while sempervirent conifer trees show the lowest rate of SOC stock change. Sempervirent broadleaved trees show the greatest increase in SOC stock 20 years [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-research-paper","cat-14-id","cat-15-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4470"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4470\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}