{"id":4285,"date":"2020-06-17T11:35:00","date_gmt":"2020-06-17T09:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=4285"},"modified":"2020-06-17T11:35:00","modified_gmt":"2020-06-17T09:35:00","slug":"short-term-effects-of-biochar-on-soil-co2-efflux-in-boreal-scots-pine-forests","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2020\/06\/17\/short-term-effects-of-biochar-on-soil-co2-efflux-in-boreal-scots-pine-forests\/","title":{"rendered":"Short-term effects of biochar on soil CO2 efflux in boreal Scots pine forests"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong>Key message<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">During the first summer, wood biochar amendments increased soil temperature, pH, and soil CO 2 effluxes in a xeric boreal Scots pine forest. The increase of soil CO 2 efflux could be largely explained by increases in by soil temperature. Higher biochar application rates (1.0 vs 0.5 kg m \u22122 ) led to higher soil CO 2 efflux while the pyrolysis temperature of biochar (500 or 650 \u00b0C) had no effect on soil CO 2 efflux.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Context<\/strong> Using biochar as a soil amendment has been proposed to increase the carbon sequestration in soils. However, a more rapid soil organic matter turnover after biochar application might reduce the effectiveness of biochar applications for carbon sequestration. By raising the pyrolysis temperature, biochar with lower contents of labile carbohydrates can be produced.<br \/>\n<strong>Aims<\/strong> To better understand the effects of biochar on boreal forest soil, we applied two spruce biochar with different pyrolysis temperatures (500 \u00b0C and 650 \u00b0C) at amounts of 1.0 and 0.5 kg m\u22122 in a young xeric Scots pine forest in southern Finland.<br \/>\n<strong>Methods<\/strong> Soil CO2, microbial biomass, and physiochemical properties were measured to track changes after biochar application during the first summer.<br \/>\n<strong>Results<\/strong> Soil CO2 increased 14.3% in 1.0 kg m\u22122 treatments and 4.6% in 0.5 kg m\u22122. Soil temperature and pH were obviously higher in the 1.0 kg m\u22122 treatments. Differences in soil CO2 among treatments disappear after correcting by soil temperature and soil moisture.<br \/>\n<strong>Conclusion<\/strong> Biochar increased soil CO2 mainly by raising soil temperature in the short term. Higher biochar application rates led to higher soil CO2 effluxes. The increase in soil CO2 efflux may be transient. More studies are needed to get the optimum biochar amount for carbon sequestration in boreal forest.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\nBiochar, Soil microbial biomass, Soil CO2, Soil temperature, Boreal forest<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1007\/s13595-020-00960-2'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><br \/>\nZhu, X., Zhu, T., Pumpanen, J. et al. Short-term effects of biochar on soil CO2 efflux in boreal Scots pine forests. Annals of Forest Science 77, 59 (2020). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-020-00960-2\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-020-00960-2<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>For the read-only version of the full text:<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/rdcu.be\/b40JM\">https:\/\/rdcu.be\/b40JM<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data availability<\/strong><br \/>\nThe datasets generated during and\/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Zenodo repository, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.3800097\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.3800097<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Handling Editor<\/strong><br \/>\nAna Rinc\u00f3n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message During the first summer, wood biochar amendments increased soil temperature, pH, and soil CO 2 effluxes in a xeric boreal Scots pine forest. The increase of soil CO 2 efflux could be largely explained by increases in by soil temperature. Higher biochar application rates (1.0 vs 0.5 kg m \u22122 ) led to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,110,109,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-data-in-repository","category-open-access","category-research-paper","cat-14-id","cat-110-id","cat-109-id","cat-15-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4285\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}