{"id":4230,"date":"2020-06-02T14:14:50","date_gmt":"2020-06-02T12:14:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/?p=4230"},"modified":"2020-06-02T14:14:50","modified_gmt":"2020-06-02T12:14:50","slug":"effects-of-defoliation-modalities-on-plant-growth-leaf-traits-and-carbohydrate-allocation-in-amorpha-fruticosa-l-and-robinia-pseudoacacia-l-seedlings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2020\/06\/02\/effects-of-defoliation-modalities-on-plant-growth-leaf-traits-and-carbohydrate-allocation-in-amorpha-fruticosa-l-and-robinia-pseudoacacia-l-seedlings\/","title":{"rendered":"Effects of defoliation modalities on plant growth, leaf traits, and carbohydrate allocation in Amorpha fruticosa L. and Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/06\/WangN2020-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-4237 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/06\/WangN2020-1-300x243.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"243\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/06\/WangN2020-1-300x243.png 300w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2020\/06\/WangN2020-1.png 623w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>Key message<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\" align=\"justify\">Defoliation modality significantly affected leaf traits and carbon allocation especially in the early recovery period of two Leguminosae woody species. <em>Robinia pseudoacacia<\/em> L. recovered more quickly following defoliation than <em>Amorpha fruticosa<\/em> L.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>Context<\/strong> Defoliation resulting from anthropogenic disturbance, insects, and grazing animals affects plant growth and vegetation dynamics. <em>Robinia pseudoacacia<\/em> L. and <em>Amorpha fruticosa<\/em> L. with different susceptibility to biotic attack are commonly used for vegetation restoration in North China. However, plant responses to defoliation were not fully understood in the two Leguminosae woody species.<br \/>\n<strong>Aims<\/strong> We selected <em>R. pseudoacacia<\/em> and <em>A. fruticosa<\/em> to determine the effects of defoliation on individual plant growth, leaf traits, and carbohydrate allocation and compared the two species in terms of recovery strategies following defoliation for vegetation restoration.<br \/>\n<strong>Methods<\/strong> In a greenhouse experiment, <em>A. fruticosa<\/em> and <em>R. pseudoacacia<\/em> seedlings were subjected to three defoliation treatments: defoliation of the top down (TD) or bottom up (BU) 50% of the crown, and a control without defoliation (CK). The physiological and growth traits of seedlings were determined at 1, 3, 14, 30, and 60 days following defoliation.<br \/>\n<strong>Results<\/strong> Plant growth in both species recovered after 2 months whatever defoliation modalities. Carbon allocation in both species was greatly affected by defoliation modalities during the early recovery period but had been fully recovered after 60 days of treatment. In the end of the experiment, defoliation modalities still had obvious impacts on leaf characteristics, especially in chlorophyll concentration and specific leaf area. <em>R. pseudoacacia<\/em> exhibited more evident compensatory mechanisms than <em>A. fruticosa<\/em> following defoliation.<br \/>\n<strong>Conclusion<\/strong> Defoliation modality treatments significantly affect most leaf traits and carbon allocation, especially in the early recovery period of both species. Considering the faster recovery ability of <em>R. pseudoacacia<\/em> than <em>A. fruticosa<\/em> after defoliation, <em>R. pseudoacacia<\/em> seedlings may be more suitable for vegetation restoration in North China.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><br \/>\nLeaf damage, Leaf morphology, Photosynthetic rate, Recovery stage<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1007\/s13595-020-00953-1'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p><strong>Publication<\/strong><br \/>\nWang, N., Zhao, M., Li, Q. et al. Effects of defoliation modalities on plant growth, leaf traits, and carbohydrate allocation in Amorpha fruticosa L. and Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings. Annals of Forest Science 77, 53 (2020). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-020-00953-1\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-020-00953-1<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>For the read-only version of the full text:<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/rdcu.be\/b4zte\">https:\/\/rdcu.be\/b4zte<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Data availability<\/strong><br \/>\nThe datasets generated during and\/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key message Defoliation modality significantly affected leaf traits and carbon allocation especially in the early recovery period of two Leguminosae woody species. Robinia pseudoacacia L. recovered more quickly following defoliation than Amorpha fruticosa L. Abstract Context Defoliation resulting from anthropogenic disturbance, insects, and grazing animals affects plant growth and vegetation dynamics. Robinia pseudoacacia L. and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-type","category-research-paper","cat-14-id","cat-15-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}