{"id":2491,"date":"2017-10-02T16:06:20","date_gmt":"2017-10-02T14:06:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ist.blogs.inra.fr\/afs\/?p=2491"},"modified":"2017-10-02T16:06:20","modified_gmt":"2017-10-02T14:06:20","slug":"influence-of-different-forest-protection-strategies-on-spruce-tree-mortality-during-a-bark-beetle-outbreak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/2017\/10\/02\/influence-of-different-forest-protection-strategies-on-spruce-tree-mortality-during-a-bark-beetle-outbreak\/","title":{"rendered":"Influence of different forest protection strategies on spruce tree mortality during a bark beetle outbreak"},"content":{"rendered":"<script type='text\/javascript' src='https:\/\/d1bxh8uas1mnw7.cloudfront.net\/assets\/embed.js'><\/script><div id=\"attachment_2492\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inra.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/Mezei2017_DSC_0354_panorama.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2492\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2492\" src=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inra.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/Mezei2017_DSC_0354_panorama-300x49.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"49\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/Mezei2017_DSC_0354_panorama-300x49.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/Mezei2017_DSC_0354_panorama-768x126.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2017\/10\/Mezei2017_DSC_0354_panorama-1024x168.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2492\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Panorama (Mezei et al., 2017)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Topical collection: <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/journal\/13595\/topicalCollection\/AC_8b557decbcd9b621ce69aa0070024e64\">Risk analysis<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Under an outbreak scenario in a buffer zone of a protected area, bark beetle-caused tree mortality was modulated by earlier natural disturbances (wind and bark beetles), sanitary management and seasonal temperature. In buffer zones, the effects of sanitary management on tree mortality remained limited due to the migration of bark beetles from unmanaged areas.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Context.<\/strong> The European spruce bark beetle (<em>Ips typographus L.<\/em>) is regarded as an economically significant pest of Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies<\/em> [L.] Karst). However, in protected areas, it is regarded as a keystone species for biodiversity. This results in two contrasting management strategies that meet in buffer zones of protected areas.<br \/>\n<strong>Aims.<\/strong> To assess which environmental and management variables are most important for tree mortality in an ongoing bark beetle outbreak and to gain a better understanding of the challenges and recommendations for buffer zone management under the influence of nearby unmanaged stands in a protected area.<br \/>\n<strong>Methods.<\/strong> Norway spruce tree mortality was assessed in 419 forest stands in the High Tatra Mountains. To account for spatial and temporal autocorrelations, generalized additive mixed models (GAMM) were used, and an information-theory (I-T) approach was adopted for model selection to test the influence of environmental variables, natural disturbances and the previous year\u2019s sanitary cutting on bark beetle-caused tree mortality.<br \/>\n<strong>Results.<\/strong> In buffer zones, <em>P. abies<\/em> tree mortality caused by <em>I. typographus<\/em> was positively correlated to natural disturbances and sanitary cutting in the previous year.<br \/>\n<strong>Conclusion.<\/strong> The previous year\u2019s sanitary cutting, maximum temperature sums, wind disturbance and trees left in no-intervention stands contributed to tree mortality in buffer zones. In these zones, the decrease of tree mortality in response to sanitary management remained limited due to the migration of bark beetles from unmanaged areas. However, sanitary management in buffer zones remains necessary for the isolation of bark beetle outbreaks in unmanaged areas.<\/p>\n<p>Keywords<br \/>\n<em>Picea abies<\/em>, <em>Ips typographus<\/em>, Disturbance, Temperature, Wind, Protected area<\/p>\n<div class='altmetric-embed' data-badge-type='donut' data-doi='10.1007\/s13595-017-0663-9'  style='float: right; ' ><\/div>\n<p>Publication<br \/>\nMezei, P., Bla\u017eenec, M., Grodzki, W. et al. Annals of Forest Science (2017) 74: 65. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-017-0663-9\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13595-017-0663-9<\/a><\/p>\n<p>For the read-only version of the full text: <a href=\"http:\/\/rdcu.be\/wnGe\">http:\/\/rdcu.be\/wnGe<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Topical collection: Risk analysis Under an outbreak scenario in a buffer zone of a protected area, bark beetle-caused tree mortality was modulated by earlier natural disturbances (wind and bark beetles), sanitary management and seasonal temperature. In buffer zones, the effects of sanitary management on tree mortality remained limited due to the migration of bark beetles [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":2492,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-article-type","category-research-paper","cat-14-id","cat-15-id","has_thumb"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2491"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2491\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ist.blogs.inrae.fr\/afs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}